Accounting for lack of representation in dementia research: Generalizing KHANDLE study findings on the prevalence of cognitive impairment to the California older population

Adult Aging Social Determinants of Health Biological Psychology Clinical Sciences prevalence racial/ethnic disparities Clinical sciences Neurodegenerative Alzheimer's Disease Basic Behavioral and Social Science ethnic disparities California Healthy Aging Life Change Events 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Behavioral and Social Science Acquired Cognitive Impairment Prevalence Psychology Humans Cognitive Dysfunction Aetiology generalizability cognitive impairment Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Neurosciences Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) Hispanic or Latino racial Brain Disorders 3. Good health Geriatrics Neurological Biological psychology Dementia Reduced Inequalities 2.4 Surveillance and distribution dementia
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12522 Publication Date: 2022-02-01T09:54:27Z
ABSTRACT
Most dementia studies are not population-representative; statistical tools can be applied to samples obtain critically-needed population-representative estimates, but yet widely used.We pooled data from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) study California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (CA-BRFSS), a study. Using weights accounting for sociodemographic/health differences between KHANDLE CA-BRFSS, we estimated cognitive impairment prevalence age- sex-adjusted racial/ethnic inequalities in adults 65+ without prior diagnosis.After weighting KHANDLE, was 20.3% (95% confidence interval 17.8-23.0); unweighted 24.8% (23.1%-26.6%). Inequalities (larger prevalences) were observed among Black Asian groups versus whites.We used novel approach estimate inequalities. Such help estimates existing inform efforts reduce disparities.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (34)
CITATIONS (17)