The 340B Program and oral specialty drugs for advanced prostate cancer

• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35262
• Publication Date: 2024-02-24T02:04:37Z
• Authors: Kassem S. Faraj; Samuel R. Kaufman; Mary Oerline; Lindsey A. Herrel; Avinash Maganty; Megan E. V. Caram; Vahakn B. Shahinian; Brent K. Hollenbeck
• Keywords: Male; Aged, 80 and over; Prostatic Neoplasms; Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Medicare; United States; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Health Expenditures; Aged; Retrospective Studies

AbstractIntroductionExpensive oral specialty drugs for advanced prostate cancer can be associated with treatment disparities. The 340B program allows hospitals to purchase medications at discounts, generating savings that can improve care of the socioeconomically disadvantaged. This study assessed the effect of hospital 340B participation on advanced prostate cancer.MethodsThe authors performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with advanced prostate cancer from 2012 to 2019. The primary outcome was use of an oral specialty drug. Secondary outcomes included monthly out‐of‐pocket costs and treatment adherence. We evaluated the effects of 1) hospital 340B participation, 2) a regional measure vulnerability, the social vulnerability index (SVI), and 3) the interaction between hospital 340B participation and SVI on outcomes.ResultsThere were 2237 and 1100 men who received care at 340B and non‐340B hospitals. There was no difference in specialty drug use between 340B and non‐340B hospitals, whereas specialty drug use decreased with increased SVI (odds ratio, 0.95, p = .038). However, the interaction between hospital 340B participation and SVI on specialty drug use was not significant. Neither 340B participation, SVI, or their interaction were associated with out‐of‐pocket costs. Although hospital 340B participation and SVI were not associated with treatment adherence, their interaction was significant (p = .020). This demonstrated that 340B was associated with better adherence among socially vulnerable men.ConclusionsThe 340B program was not associated with specialty drug use in men with advanced prostate cancer. However, among those who were started on therapy, 340B was associated with increased treatment adherence in more socially vulnerable men.