The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study

• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4677-5
• Publication Date: 2017-08-22T08:48:56Z
• Authors: Abtin Alvand; Tanvir Khan; Cathy Jenkins; Jonathan L. Rees; William F. Jackson; Christopher A. F....; David W. Murray; Andrew J. Price
• Keywords: Aged, 80 and over; Male; Patient-Specific Modeling; Knee Joint; Recovery of Function; Middle Aged; 03 medical and health sciences; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; 0302 clinical medicine; Surgery, Computer-Assisted; Humans; Knee; Female; Prospective Studies; Joint Diseases; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aged

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been proposed as a means of improving surgical accuracy and ease of implantation during technically challenging procedures such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to compare the accuracy of implantation and functional outcome of mobile-bearing medial UKAs implanted with and without PSI by experienced UKA surgeons.Mobile-bearing medial UKAs were implanted in 43 patients using either PSI guides or conventional instrumentation. Intra-operative measurements, meniscal bearing size implanted, and post-operative radiographic analyses were performed to assess component positioning. Functional outcome was determined using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).PSI guides could not be used in three cases due to concerns regarding accuracy and registration onto native anatomy, particularly on the tibial side. In general, similar component alignment and positioning was achieved using the two systems (n.s. for coronal/sagittal alignment and tibial coverage). The PSI group had greater tibial slope (p = 0.029). The control group had a higher number of optimum size meniscal bearing inserted (95 vs 52%; p = 0.001). There were no differences in OKS improvements (n.s).Component positioning for the two groups was similar for the femur but less accurate on the tibial side using PSI, often with some unnecessarily deep resections of the tibial plateau. Although PSI was comparable to conventional instrumentation based on OKS improvements at 12 months, we continue to use conventional instrumentation for UKA at our institution until further improvements to the PSI guides can be demonstrated.Therapeutic, Level I.