Meniscectomy is still a frequent orthopedic procedure: a pending need for education on the meniscus treatment possibilities

• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06612-w
• Publication Date: 2021-06-04T06:03:46Z
• Authors: Paweł Bąkowski; Kamilla Bąkowska‐...; Kinga Ciemniewska...; Tomasz Piontek
• Keywords: Arthroscopy; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Knee; Meniscus; Menisci, Tibial; Meniscectomy; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; 3. Good health

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the current status of education of polish surgeons in the subject of meniscus repair possibilities. The analysis of the possible correlations between the number of knee arthroscopy procedures performed by polish surgeons and their decision whether to remove or to repair the damaged meniscus has been performed.MethodsTwo‐hundred and five registered orthopedic surgeons took part in surveys. The questionnaire contained the description of 20 patients with different types of meniscus damage and three questions concerning the experience in knee arthroscopy (two questions) and a choice of the treatment method (one question). Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non‐experts (≤ 100 cases).ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 194 knee surgeons from Poland with different levels in knee arthroscopy experience. For most cases, experts and non‐experts agreed on the meniscus treatment method. Statistically significant differences in the recommended treatment between experts and non‐experts were observed in 4 cases, where experts decided to repair the damage rather than to perform the meniscectomy.ConclusionsMeniscectomy remains a frequent orthopedic procedure, despite meniscal sparing having been advocated for several decades now and despite the existence of meniscus repair technique which gives good clinical outcomes—augmentation of the damaged meniscus with a collagen membrane. Polish surgeons still need education on the meniscus treatment possibilities.Level of evidenceV.