Combination of different chromatographic and sampling modes for high-resolution mass spectrometric screening of organic microcontaminants in water

• DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03226-6
• Publication Date: 2021-02-24T15:04:24Z
• Authors: Verónica Castro; José Benito Quintana; Inmaculada Carpin...; Julio Cobas; Nieves Carro; Rafael Cela; Rosario Rodil
• Keywords: Passive sampling; Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); Liquid chromatography; Surface water; Quadrupole-time-of-flight (QTOF); 01 natural sciences; 6. Clean water; Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC); 0104 chemical sciences

This study explores the combination of two sampling strategies (polar organic compounds integrative sampler (POCIS) vs. spot sampling) and four chromatographic retention modes (reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), mixed-mode liquid chromatography (MMLC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC)) for high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) screening of organic pollutants in water samples. To this end, a suspect screening approach, using iterative data-dependent tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) driven by a library of 3227 chemicals (including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, drugs of abuse, human metabolites, industrial chemicals and other pollutants), was employed. Results show that POCIS can afford a larger number of positive identifications as compared to spot sampling. On the other hand, the best suited retention mechanisms, in terms of identified analytes, are SFC, and followed by RPLC, MMLC and HILIC. However, the best combination (POCIS + SFC) would only allow the identification of 67% of the detected analytes. Thus, the combination of the two sampling strategies, spot and passive sampling, with two orthogonal retention mechanisms, RPLC and SFC, is proposed in order to maximize the number of analytes detected (89%). This strategy was applied to different surface water (river and estuary) samples from Galicia (NW Spain). A total of 155 compounds were detected at a confidence level 2a, from which the major class was pharmaceuticals (61%).