When Surgical Resources are Severely Constrained, Who Receives Care? Determinants of Access to Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in Uganda

• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3874-1
• Publication Date: 2017-01-17T18:14:42Z
• Authors: Trina Stephens; Alexander Mezei; Nathan N. O’Hara; Jeffrey Potter; Rodney Mugarura; Piotr A. Blachut; Peter J. O’Brien; Tito Beyeza; Gerard P. Slobogean
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Accidents, Traffic; 1. No poverty; 16. Peace & justice; Health Services Accessibility; 3. Good health; Hospitalization; 03 medical and health sciences; Orthopedics; 0302 clinical medicine; Health Resources; Humans; Female; Orthopedic Procedures; Uganda; Femoral Fractures; Referral and Consultation

AbstractBackgroundIn low‐ and middle‐income countries, the volume of traumatic injuries requiring orthopaedic intervention routinely exceeds the capacity of available surgical resources. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of surgical care for lower extremity fracture patients at a high‐demand, resource‐limited public hospital in Uganda.MethodsSkeletally mature patients admitted with the intention of definitive surgical treatment of an isolated tibia or femur fractures to the national referral hospital in Uganda were recruited to participate in this study. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data were collected through participant interviews at the time of injury and 6 months post‐injury. Social capital (use of social networks to gain access to surgery), financial leveraging, and ethnicity were also included as variables in this analysis. A probit estimation model was used to identify independent and interactive predictors of surgical treatment.ResultsOf the 64 patients included in the final analysis, the majority of participants were male (83%), with a mean age of 40.6, and were injured in a motor vehicle accident (77%). Due to resource constraints, only 58% of participants received surgical care. The use of social capital and femur fractures were identified as significant predictors of receiving surgical treatment, with social capital emerging as the strongest predictor of access to surgery (p < 0.05).ConclusionLimited infrastructure, trained personnel, and surgical supplies rations access to surgical care. In this environment, participants with advantageous social connections were able to self‐advocate for surgery where demand for these services greatly exceeded available resources.