Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Social Media: Does Science Trend As Much As Everyday Events?

• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05769-8
• Publication Date: 2020-09-05T20:07:43Z
• Authors: Laura Lorenzon; Rebecca C. Grossman; Kjetil Soreide
• Keywords: Theme (computing); Altmetrics

AbstractBackgroundThe approach to the scientific literature is evolving. Currently, dissemination of articles happens in real time through social media (SoMe) channels, and little is known about its impact in medicine. The aim of this study was to investigate if SoMe dissemination followed trends independent from articles type and content.MethodsFirst, the SoMe engagement of a popular theme (#BlackFriday) and a relevant theme (#ClimateChange) was compared using a SoMe analytic tool to test if the popular theme would reach more engagement. In a second analysis, themes in colorectal surgery in the SoMe community were explored. Altmetric Explorer was searched for the term “colorectal surgery” and the outputs were categorized into ‘randomized controlled trials’ (RCTs) and ‘other studies’. Subgroups were compared for the Altmetric scores using statistical analyses.ResultsThe analytic tool documented that #BlackFriday outnumbered #ClimateChange in mentions and engagement (1.6 million vs 127.000 mentions). Following, Altmetric Explorer identified 1381 articles, including 92 RCTs (7.1%). Overall, 25,554 mentions were documented from 1205 outputs (97.0% by Twitter). A greater percentage of “other studies” ranked in the lower Altmetric score categories (p = 0.0007). Similarly, the median Altmetric score was higher in the RCT subgroup comparing with “other studies” (6.5 vs. 2.0, Mann–Whitney p = 0.0001).ConclusionsIn this study, RCTs represented just the 7.1% of the studies and produced 11% of Twitter outputs. The median Altmetric scores obtained by RCTs were higher than those of other studies.