Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI

• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1350-5
• Publication Date: 2009-03-10T11:02:22Z
• Authors: Eugene K. Choi; Jeong Kon Kim; Hyuck Jae Choi; Seong Ho Park; Bum-Woo Park; Namkug Kim; Jae Seung Kim; Ki Chun Im; Gyunggoo Cho; Kyoung-Sik Cho
• Keywords: Statistics as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Middle Aged; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; 0302 clinical medicine; Lymphatic Metastasis; Positron-Emission Tomography; Humans; Female; Lymph Nodes; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The purpose of the study was to perform a node-by-node comparison of an ADC-based diagnosis and various size-based criteria on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with regard to their correlation with PET/CT findings in patients with uterine cervical cancer. In 163 patients with 339 pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) with short-axis diameter >5 mm, the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean ADC, short- and long-axis diameters, and ratio of long- to short-axis diameters (L/S ratio) were compared in PET/CT-positive and -negative LNs. On PET/CT, 118 (35%) LNs in 58 patients were positive. The mean value of minimum and mean ADCs, short- and long-axis diameters, and L/S ratio were different in PET/CT-positive (0.6436 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 0.756 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 10.3 mm, 13.2 mm, 1.32, respectively) and PET/CT-negative LNs (0.8893 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 1.019 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 7.4 mm, 11.0 mm, 1.49, respectively) (P < 0.05). The Az value of the minimum ADC (0.864) was greater than those of mean ADC (0.836), short-axis diameter (0.764), long-axis diameter (0.640) and L/S ratio (0.652) (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy of the minimum ADC (86%, 82%) were greater than those of the short-axis diameter (55%, 74%), long-axis diameter (73%, 58%) and L/S ratio (52%, 66%) (P < 0.05). ADC showed superior correlation with PET/CT compared with conventional size-based criteria on T2WI.