Postoperative shunt failure following hemispherectomy in pediatric patients with pre-existing hydrocephalus

• DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06295-x
• Publication Date: 2024-01-25T17:34:32Z
• Authors: Nikita Das; Akshay Sharma; Michael Mann; Alan Gordillo; Ansh Desai; Demitre Serletis; Ahsan N. Moosa; Richard Rammo; William Bingaman
• Keywords: Reoperation; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsy; Hemispherectomy; Research; Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt; 03 medical and health sciences; Postoperative Complications; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Child; Retrospective Studies; Hydrocephalus

Abstract Objective The risk of hydrocephalus following hemispherectomy for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) remains high. Patients with pre-existing hydrocephalus pose a postoperative challenge, as maintaining existing shunt patency is necessary but lacks a clearly defined strategy. This study examines the incidence and predictors of shunt failure in pediatric hemispherectomy patients with pre-existing ventricular shunts.

Methods We performed a retrospective chart review at our center to identify pediatric patients diagnosed with DRE who were treated with ventricular shunt prior to their first hemispherectomy surgery. Demographic and perioperative data were obtained including shunt history, hydrocephalus etiology, epilepsy duration, surgical technique, and postoperative outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test and Pearson correlation, with Bonferroni correction to a = 0.00625 and a = 0.01, respectively.

Results Five of nineteen (26.3%) patients identified with ventriculoperitoneal shunting prior to hemispherectomy experienced postoperative shunt malfunction. All 5 of these patients underwent at least 1 shunt revision prior to hemispherectomy, with a significant association between pre- and post-hemispherectomy shunt revisions. There was no significant association between post-hemispherectomy shunt failure and valve type, intraoperative shunt alteration, postoperative external ventricular drain placement, hemispherectomy revision, lateralization of shunt relative to resection, postoperative complications, or postoperative aseptic meningitis. There was no significant correlation between number of post-hemispherectomy shunt revisions and age at shunt placement, age at hemispherectomy, epilepsy duration, or shunt duration prior to hemispherectomy.

Conclusions Earlier shunt revision surgery may portend a subsequent need for shunt revision following hemispherectomy. These findings may guide neurosurgeons in counseling patients with pre-existing ventricular shunts prior to hemispherectomy surgery.