Digestion-resistant maltodextrin effects on colonic transit time and stool weight: a randomized controlled clinical study
Adult
Dietary Fiber
Male
0301 basic medicine
Adolescent
Colonic transit time
Colon
Intestinal function
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Feces
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Double-Blind Method
Polysaccharides
Humans
Defecation
Gastrointestinal Transit
Nutrition and Dietetics
Original Contribution
3. Good health
Nutrition Assessment
Diet, Western
Dietary Supplements
Stool volume
Digestion
Female
Soluble dietary fibre
Resistant maltodextrin
DOI:
10.1007/s00394-015-1045-4
Publication Date:
2015-10-06T01:52:53Z
AUTHORS (8)
ABSTRACT
Increased awareness of the importance of dietary fibre has led to increased interest in "functional" fibre components like digestion-resistant maltodextrin (RMD). This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study assessed the effects of RMD in the colonic transit time (CTT) and defecation characteristics (frequency, stool volume and consistency).Sixty-six healthy adult volunteers (32 men) who did not have a daily defecation habit had a 7-day run-in period before the 21-day intervention period with RMD or placebo. CTT and segmental CTT (SCTT) were assessed by a single abdominal X-ray film taken at the end of both periods after radiopaque marker ingestion. Defecation characteristics and intestinal functions were also assessed, which were self-reported by patients. Intragroup comparisons were evaluated by Student's paired t test, Bonferroni test and Chi-square test, while time comparisons by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-by-treatment interaction by repeated-measures ANOVA.Fifty-seven subjects were assessed for CTT (placebo, n = 28; RMD, n = 29). In the RMD group, the total CTT, left SCTT and rectosigmoidal SCTT decreased significantly compared to baseline (p < 0.01 each; -13.3, -4.7, -8.7 h, respectively). Significant differences between groups were observed in total CTT and left SCTT. Significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed in the RMD group for stool volume (p = 0.014), increasing 56 % compared to baseline (p < 0.01), while remained unchanged in the placebo group. Stool consistency was improved only in the RMD group (p < 0.01). No adverse effects related to study products were observed.The results show that RMD improved CTT, stool volume, stool consistency and some intestinal functions in a healthy population.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (58)
CITATIONS (17)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....