Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate: survey of workers exposed to plastisols

• DOI: 10.1007/s00420-007-0289-6
• Publication Date: 2007-12-20T11:39:54Z
• Authors: R. Gaudin; P. Marsan; A. Robert; P. Ducos; A. Pruvost; M. Lévi; P. Bouscaillou
• Keywords: Plasticizer

The aim of this study was to perform a biological monitoring survey of workers exposed to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in a factory using polyvinyl chloride plastisols and to contribute additional occupational data of exposure particularly sparse in the industrial sectors where this plasticizer is used.Three urinary metabolites of DEHP, mono(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (MEHP), mono(5-carboxy-2-ethylpentyl)phthalate (MCEPP) and 2-ethylhexanoic acid (2-EHA) were quantified in five workers using a plastisol (containing 33% of DEHP) and in five unexposed workers (controls), during 5 days with pre- and post-shift sampling. Analyses were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) with on-line extraction.Median concentrations of pre- and post-shift urinary samples in the exposed workers (n = 25) were 16.1 and 55.9 microg/l for MEHP, 37.6 and 103.7 microg/l for MCEPP and 46.3 and 72.1 microg/l for 2-EHA, respectively. In the controls (n = 19), the corresponding values were 12.0 and 10.4 microg/l for MEHP, 38.1 and 11.4 microg/l for MCEPP and 31.9 and 46.0 microg/l for 2-EHA, respectively. There is a significant increase (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.05) of post-shift excretion in the exposed workers versus unexposed controls and in post-shift versus pre-shift concentrations only in the exposed workers.MEHP and MCEPP are shown to be suitable biomarkers to assess DEHP exposure while 2-EHA, less specific but classified in the category 3 of the European Union (EU) reproductive toxicants, is also an interesting biomarker. There is clear evidence of occupational exposure of workers in this factory.