Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years
Male
610
Practice Patterns
Abdominal emergencies; Acute abdomen; Clinical audit; Emergency laparoscopy guidelines; Laparoscopic acute care surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy acute abdomen; National survey; Nationwide survey on laparoscopy
Acute
Laparoscopic surgery
Clinical audit
Acute abdomen
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Abdomen
617
Humans
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Emergencie
Laparoscopy acute abdomen
National survey
Abdomen, Acute
Physicians'
Abdominal emergencies; Acute abdomen; Clinical audit; Emergency laparoscopy guidelines; Laparoscopic acute care surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy acute abdomen; National survey; Nationwide survey on laparoscopy; Surgery
Abdominal emergencies
Laparoscopic surgery, Abdominal emergencies, Acute abdomen, Laparoscopy, National survey, Nationwide survey on laparoscopy, Emergency laparoscopy guidelines, Clinical audit, Laparoscopy acute abdomen, Laparoscopic acute care surgery
3. Good health
Italy
Emergency laparoscopy guideline
Health Care Survey
Emergency laparoscopy guidelines
Health Care Surveys
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Abdominal emergencie
Laparoscopic acute care surgery
Female
Laparoscopy
Guideline Adherence
Nationwide survey on laparoscopy
Emergencies
Human
DOI:
10.1007/s00464-016-5175-4
Publication Date:
2016-08-29T20:00:56Z
AUTHORS (14)
ABSTRACT
Several authors have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy in selected cases of abdominal emergencies. The aim of the study was to analyse the current Italian practice on the use of laparoscopy in abdominal emergencies and to evaluate the impact of the 2012 national guidelines on the daily surgical activity.Two surveys (42 closed-ended questions) on the use of laparoscopy in acute abdomen were conducted nationwide with an online questionnaire, respectively, before (2010) and after (2014) the national guidelines publication. Data from two surveys were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and data were considered significant when p < 0.05.Two-hundred and one and 234 surgical units answered to the surveys in 2010 and 2014, respectively. Out of 144,310 and 127,013 overall surgical procedures, 23,407 and 20,102, respectively, were abdominal emergency operations. Respectively 24.74 % (in 2010) versus 30.27 % (in 2014) of these emergency procedures were approached laparoscopically, p = 0.42. The adoption of laparoscopy increased in all the considered clinical scenarios, with statistical significance in acute appendicitis (44 vs. 64.7 %; p = 0.004). The percentage of units approaching Hinchey III acute diverticulitis with laparoscopy in 26-75 % of cases (14.0 vs. 29.7 %; p = 0.009), those with >25 % of surgeons confident with laparoscopic approach to acute diverticulitis (29.9 vs. 54 %; p = 0.0009), the units with >50 % of surgeons confident with laparoscopic approach to acute appendicitis, cholecystitis and perforated duodenal ulcer, all significantly increased in the time frame. The majority of respondents declared that the 2012 national guidelines influenced their clinical practice.The surveys showed an increasing use of laparoscopy for patients with abdominal emergencies. The 2012 national guidelines profoundly influenced the Italian surgical practice in the laparoscopic approach to the acute abdomen.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (37)
CITATIONS (32)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....