Latest guideline of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer may not be suitable for Chinese patients: retrospective study findings from two centers

• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11293-w
• Publication Date: 2024-09-26T22:01:23Z
• Authors: Yu Mei; Jianpeng Gao; Benyan Zhang; Tienan Feng; Wei Wu; Zhenggang Zhu; Zhenglun Zhu
• Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Guideline; Endoscopic mucosal resection

To analyze the diagnostic efficiency of the four absolute endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) indications for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of Chinese patients with early gastric cancer (EGC).We retrospectively analyzed EGC patients who underwent radical D2 gastrectomy from January 2019 to December 2022. We evaluated the rate of LNM, false-negative rate, and negative predictive value of the four ESD indications.Of enrolled 2722 EGC patients, 388 (14.3%) patients presented LNM. Tumor size > 2 cm, ulceration, submucosal invasion, undifferentiated type, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of LNM in patients with EGC. 1062 (39%) cases of EGC conformed to the four EDS indications; however, 4% of them had LNM. 451 cases were fully in accord with the fourth ESD indication (undifferentiated intramucosal carcinoma without ulceration and a maximum lesion diameter of ≤ 2 cm), and 35 of them had LNM, with a false-negative rate (FNR) of 9.02% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.24%. There was significant difference among the four indications in terms of the rate of LNM (1.0% vs 1.5% vs 1.3% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001), FNR (1.03% vs 0.52% vs 0.26% vs 9.02%, P < 0.001), and NPV (98.99% vs 98.53% vs 98.75% vs 92.24%, P < 0.001).Overall, the fourth ESD indication was associated with a high rate of LNM compared to the other three indications. Thus, it might not be safe to classify it as an absolute indication in Chinese patients with EGC.