Incidence of intravenous contrast extravasation: increased risk for patients with deep brachial catheter placement from the emergency department

• DOI: 10.1007/s10140-013-1185-x
• Publication Date: 2014-01-06T12:43:46Z
• Authors: Andrew D. Hardie; Borko Kereshi
• Keywords: Male; Risk; Incidence; Contrast Media; Quality Improvement; Veins; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Catheterization, Peripheral; Injections, Intravenous; Arm; Humans; Female; Prospective Studies; Emergency Service, Hospital; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials

Deep brachial intravenous catheter (IV) placement can be performed in emergency department patients with difficult vascular access, but the safety of deep brachial IV for iodinated contrast administration has not been assessed. This study compares the relative risk for extravasation of deep brachial IV compared with antecubital IV during power injected computed tomography (CT) examinations. A departmental practice quality improvement was performed to assess the rate of IV extravasation for all CT examinations during a 1 year period. De-identified data was analyzed with a waiver of informed consent to identify the rate and relative risk of iodinated contrast extravasation by catheter type. A total of 10,750 injections were performed, with 82 extravasation events (0.8 %). There were 51 extravasations of antecubital IV from approximately 8,599 placed (0.6 %). For 123 deep brachial IV placed, there were eight extravasations (6.5 %). The relative risk of a deep brachial IV extravasation was 9.4 compared to 0.4 for antecubital placement. Deep brachial IV demonstrated a markedly higher rate of contrast extravasation than antecubital IV. For power injected iodinated contrast administration, it is recommended to avoid the use of deep brachial IV whenever possible.