Four years of expanded newborn screening in Portugal with tandem mass spectrometry
Time Factors
Portugal
Infant, Newborn
Prognosis
3. Good health
03 medical and health sciences
Early Diagnosis
Neonatal Screening
Phenotype
0302 clinical medicine
Predictive Value of Tests
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Carnitine
Prevalence
Humans
False Positive Reactions
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Amino Acids
Biomarkers
Metabolism, Inborn Errors
Program Evaluation
DOI:
10.1007/s10545-010-9048-z
Publication Date:
2010-02-22T08:39:37Z
AUTHORS (7)
ABSTRACT
AbstractIntroductionThe Portuguese Neonatal Screening Programme (PNSP) was started in 1979 for phenylketonuria (2,590,700 newborns screened; prevalence 1:11,031) and, shortly after, for congenital hypothyroidism (2,558,455 newborns screened; prevalence 1:3,174). In 2004, expanded neonatal screening was implemented in the National Laboratory. The programme is not mandatory and has 99.8% coverage of the country (including Madeira and the Azores islands).Material and methodsIn the past 4 years, 316,243 neonates were screened with the use of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to test for selected amino acids and acylcarnitines.ResultsDuring this time, 132 patients were identified with 24 different inherited metabolic diseases (classic forms and variants). To date, the global frequency for all disorders integrated into the PNSP is estimated to be 1:1,380, with 1:2,396 for metabolic disorders. A total of 379 tests (0.12%) were classified as having false positive results, yielding an overall specificity of 99.9%. Despite the low frequency of several disorders, the positive predictive value of the overall MS/MS screening was found to be 26%, reflecting high diagnostic specificity of the method. Diagnostic sensitivity of extended screening for the different groups of disorders was 100%. Eight cases of maternal disorders [three glutaric aciduria type I, one carnitine transporter defect, and four 3‐methylcrotonyl coenzyme A (CoA) carboxylase deficiency] were also detected through newborn screening.ConclusionsOur data support the advantage of a centralised laboratory for screening an elevated number of samples and making decisions if relying on a clinical network able to provide fast treatment and a good outcome in the screened cases.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (27)
CITATIONS (66)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....