The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: results from the Michigan SimSmoke tobacco policy simulation model

Adult Male Nicotiana Michigan Adolescent Public Policy Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Prevalence Humans Computer Simulation Aged Health Policy Smoking 1. No poverty Middle Aged Models, Theoretical Taxes 16. Peace & justice 3. Good health 13. Climate action Female Smoking Cessation Forecasting
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-016-0735-4 Publication Date: 2016-03-18T17:51:19Z
ABSTRACT
Michigan has implemented several of the tobacco control policies recommended by the World Health Organization MPOWER goals. We consider the effect of those policies and additional policies consistent with MPOWER goals on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths (SADs).The SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model is used to examine the effect of past policies and a set of additional policies to meet the MPOWER goals. The model is adapted to Michigan using state population, smoking, and policy data starting in 1993. SADs are estimated using standard attribution methods. Upon validating the model, SimSmoke is used to distinguish the effect of policies implemented since 1993 against a counterfactual with policies kept at their 1993 levels. The model is then used to project the effect of implementing stronger policies beginning in 2014.SimSmoke predicts smoking prevalence accurately between 1993 and 2010. Since 1993, a relative reduction in smoking rates of 22 % by 2013 and of 30 % by 2054 can be attributed to tobacco control policies. Of the 22 % reduction, 44 % is due to taxes, 28 % to smoke-free air laws, 26 % to cessation treatment policies, and 2 % to youth access. Moreover, 234,000 SADs are projected to be averted by 2054. With additional policies consistent with MPOWER goals, the model projects that, by 2054, smoking prevalence can be further reduced by 17 % with 80,000 deaths averted relative to the absence of those policies.Michigan SimSmoke shows that tobacco control policies, including cigarette taxes, smoke-free air laws, and cessation treatment policies, have substantially reduced smoking and SADs. Higher taxes, strong mass media campaigns, and cessation treatment policies would further reduce smoking prevalence and SADs.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (48)
CITATIONS (14)