Maculopathy following exposure to visible and infrared radiation from a laser pointer: a clinical case study

• DOI: 10.1007/s10633-016-9530-5
• Publication Date: 2016-02-26T05:55:23Z
• Authors: James V. M. Hanson; Julian Sromicki; Mario Mangold; Matthias Golling; Christina Gerth-K...
• Keywords: 10018 Ophthalmology Clinic; 0301 basic medicine; Light; Ocular laser injury; Infrared Rays; Visual Acuity; 610 Medicine & health; Retina; 2809 Sensory Systems; 03 medical and health sciences; 2737 Physiology (medical); Retinal Diseases; Electroretinography; Humans; Child; Retrospective Studies; Lasers; MF; 2731 Ophthalmology; 3. Good health; Electrooculography; OCT; ERG; Female; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Laser pointer devices have become increasingly available in recent years, and their misuse has caused a number of ocular injuries. Online distribution channels permit trade in devices which may not conform to international standards in terms of their output power and spectral content. We present a case study of ocular injury caused by one such device.The patient was examined approximately 9 months following laser exposure using full-field and multifocal electroretinography (ERG and MF-ERG), electrooculography (EOG), and optical coherence tomography (OCT), in addition to a full ophthalmological examination. MF-ERG, OCT, and the ophthalmological examination were repeated 7 months after the first examination. The output of the laser pointer was measured.Despite severe focal damage to the central retina visible fundoscopically and with OCT, all electrophysiological examinations were quantitatively normal; however, qualitatively the central responses of the MF-ERG appeared slightly reduced. When the MF-ERG was repeated 7 months later, all findings were normal. The laser pointer was found to emit both visible and infrared radiation in dangerous amounts.Loss of retinal function following laser pointer injury may not always be detectable using standard electrophysiological tests. Exposure to non-visible radiation should be considered as a possible aggravating factor when assessing cases of alleged laser pointer injury.