Large Differences in Livelihood Responses and Outcomes to Increased Conservation Enforcement in a Protected Area

• DOI: 10.1007/s10745-021-00267-4
• Publication Date: 2021-10-08T04:48:34Z
• Authors: Joel Persson; Scott Ford; Anousith Keophoxay; Ole Mertz; Jonas Østergaard ...; Thoumthone Vongvi...; Michael Zörner
• Keywords: 2. Zero hunger; 330; 0211 other engineering and technologies; 1. No poverty; Protected Areas; 02 engineering and technology; 15. Life on land; 300; Article; Lao PDR; 11. Sustainability; Mixed Methods; Livelihoods; Integrated Conservation and development

Despite the popularity of integrated conservation and development approaches to protected area management, adjacent communities increasingly face livelihood dilemmas. Yet understanding of how market processes and conservation enforcement interact to influence livelihood responses remains limited. Targeting eight villages in Nam Et-Phou Louey (NEPL) National Park in northern Lao PDR, we draw on survey data with 255 households, 93 semi-structured interviews, and meso-level data on village conditions to examine how residents navigate associated livelihood dilemmas. A cluster analysis reveals five livelihood types with divergent capacities to engage in market development and cope with enforcement pressures. We show how market linkages, historical conservation interventions, and local access conditions shape livelihoods and differences between villages. Our approach yields a nuanced picture of how global conservation efforts result in an uneven distribution of costs and benefits at local scales. Conservation measures must account for highly divergent capacities to cope with access loss and diversify livelihoods.The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10745-021-00267-4.