Which imaging method should be used for genicular nerve radio frequency thermocoagulation in chronic knee osteoarthritis?

• DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9886-9
• Publication Date: 2016-05-03T09:02:07Z
• Authors: Sinem Sarı; Osman Nuri Aydın; Yasemin Turan; Selda Şen; Pınar Özlülerden; İmran Kurt Ömürlü; Ferdi Gulastı
• Keywords: WOMAC

This study aimed to perform genicular nerve RF neurotomy using two different imaging methods, fluoroscopy and ultrasound, and to compare the clinical effects and reliability of the two methods. Fifty patients with osteoarthritis were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into group 1 (fluoroscopy imaging) and group 2 (ultrasound imaging). Outcomes were measured using a pain scale (visual analog scale; VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Index of Osteoarthritis. The application time in the ultrasound group (20.2 ± 6.4 min) was shorter than in the fluoroscopy group (25 ± 4.8 min) (p < 0.05). There was no difference in pain relief and functional status between the ultrasound and fluoroscopy groups. Decrease in VAS score and WOMAC total score in the first and third months was significant in both groups (p < 0.001). GNRFT under ultrasound guidance was easily applicable, safe and dynamic, and required no radiation to achieve the same benefit as the fluoroscopy-guided interventions.