Definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with definitive conventional radiotherapy in cervical oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Adult Aged, 80 and over Male Esophageal Neoplasms Middle Aged 3. Good health 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Humans Female Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Neck Aged
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0510-8 Publication Date: 2015-02-02T05:54:03Z
ABSTRACT
The authors compared definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with definitive conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) in cervical oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC).A total of 101 patients with CESCC treated with definitive radiotherapy from January 2001 to April 2012 were analysed. 37 patients were irradiated using 2D-RT, whereas 64 cases were treated using IMRT.The median follow-up time was 15.5 months for all the patients. For all patients, the overall 2-year local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), and overall survival (OS) rate was 67.4, 85.2 and 46.2%, respectively. The 2-year LFFS rate and the 2-year RFFS rate in the IMRT group were higher than the 2D-RT group, although no statistically significant difference was observed in LFFS and RFFS. No statistically significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) between the groups. Compared with 2D-RT, the rate of grade 3 dysphagia after radiotherapy was lower (6.3 vs. 8.1%) and none had hypothyroidism requiring lifelong thyroxine replacement in the IMRT group. Matched-cases analysis did not show a statistical difference in terms of LFFS, RFFS and OS between the groups.Although no statistically significant difference was observed in OS, LFFS and RFFS between the IMRT group and the 2D-RT group, the incidence of late toxicity declined using IMRT, thereby resulting in an improved therapeutic ratio for patients with CESCC.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (26)
CITATIONS (13)