Combatting carelessness: Can placement of quality check items help reduce careless responses?
Carelessness
DOI:
10.1007/s12144-020-01183-4
Publication Date:
2020-11-18T21:02:50Z
AUTHORS (1)
ABSTRACT
There is extensive literature on identifying careless responses in survey data and acknowledging their negative impact on accurate data analysis (Goodman, Cryder, & Cheema, 2013; Huang et al., 2015a, b; Meade and Craig, 2012). However, there are very limited findings on how researchers can help prevent participants from responding carelessly in the first place. The current study manipulated the placement of a quality check item (i.e., early placement versus late placement) and showed that participants were less likely to carelessly respond when the quality check items were placed later in the survey. Quality check items were also able to identify careless responses more than other approaches (i.e., LongString index, completion time index, and self-reported indicators). When using quality check items, it appears to be best when used toward the end of the survey. There are plenty of opportunities for future studies to expand on this research to uncover ways that can help deter careless responding.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (21)
CITATIONS (6)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....