Insulin sensitivity and endothelial function in hypertensionA comparison of temocapril and candesartan

• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.08.033
• Publication Date: 2005-03-08T18:31:07Z
• Authors: H TOMIYAMA; K MOTOBE; G ZAYDUN; Y KOJI; M YAMBE; T ARAI; T KUSHIRO; A YAMASHINA
• Keywords: Cross-Over Studies; Thiazepines; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Biphenyl Compounds; Tetrazoles; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Bradykinin; Nitric Oxide; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Hypertension; Humans; Benzimidazoles; Single-Blind Method; Endothelium, Vascular; Insulin Resistance; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers

Recent studies have suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) have a more pronounced effect on endothelial function (END) than angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB); however, whether this pronounced effect is more beneficial to patients with insulin sensitivity (IS) remains uncertain. The present study compared the effects of ACEi and ARB on END and IS in patients with hypertension.A total of 23 patients with hypertension were given either ACEi or ARB alternatively in a cross-over manner for 8-week intervals. Both END and IS were examined after each treatment period; END was assessed by the response of forearm blood flow to reactive hyperemia and IS by an insulin tolerance test. The plasma levels of bradykinin (BK), NOx, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha), and adiponectin (Adi) were also measured after each treatment.We found that END, BK, and NOx were higher after the ACEi treatment than after the ARB treatment. Although the IS and the Adi levels were similar after both treatments, the TNF-alpha level was lower after the ARB treatment than after the ACEi.We conclude that ACEi and ARB may have similar effects on insulin sensitivity, irrespective of the more pronounced effects of ACEi on endothelial function. The BK-NO pathway might contribute, at least in part, to the pronounced effect of ACEi. On the other hand, the underlying mechanisms affecting insulin sensitivity might differ for both treatments. These results suggest that endothelial function is not a major determinant of insulin sensitivity under physiologic conditions.