Assessing the value of mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Adult
Male
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Middle Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Severity of Illness Index
Asthma
Drug Costs
Markov Chains
3. Good health
Eosinophils
03 medical and health sciences
Treatment Outcome
0302 clinical medicine
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Quality of Life
Humans
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Anti-Asthmatic Agents
Aged
DOI:
10.1016/j.anai.2016.10.028
Publication Date:
2016-12-05T02:30:56Z
AUTHORS (7)
ABSTRACT
Adding mepolizumab to standard treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and controller medications could decrease asthma exacerbations and use of long-term oral steroids in patients with severe disease and increased eosinophils; however, mepolizumab is costly and its cost effectiveness is unknown.To estimate the cost effectiveness of mepolizumab.A Markov model was used to determine the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for mepolizumab plus standard of care (SoC) and for SoC alone. The population, adults with severe eosinophilic asthma, was modeled for a lifetime time horizon. A responder scenario analysis was conducted to determine the cost effectiveness for a cohort able to achieve and maintain asthma control.Over a lifetime treatment horizon, 23.96 exacerbations were averted per patient receiving mepolizumab plus SoC. Avoidance of exacerbations and decrease in long-term oral steroid use resulted in more than $18,000 in cost offsets among those receiving mepolizumab, but treatment costs increased by more than $600,000. Treatment with mepolizumab plus SoC vs SoC alone resulted in a cost-effectiveness estimate of $386,000 per QALY. To achieve cost effectiveness of approximately $150,000 per QALY, mepolizumab would require a more than 60% price discount. At current pricing, treating a responder cohort yielded cost-effectiveness estimates near $160,000 per QALY.The estimated cost effectiveness of mepolizumab exceeds value thresholds. Achieving these thresholds would require significant discounts from the current list price. Alternatively, treatment limited to responders improves the cost effectiveness toward, but remains still slightly above, these thresholds. Payers interested in improving the efficiency of health care resources should consider negotiations of the mepolizumab price and ways to predict and assess the response to mepolizumab.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (26)
CITATIONS (67)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....