A comparison of minimally invasive approach vs conventional approach for volar plating of distal radial fractures
Orthopedic surgery
Adult
Male
Time Factors
Adolescent
Middle Aged
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Treatment Outcome
0302 clinical medicine
Humans
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Surgery
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Female
Radius Fractures
Bone Plates
RD701-811
Research Article
Aged
Follow-Up Studies
DOI:
10.1016/j.aott.2017.02.013
Publication Date:
2017-02-28T03:02:26Z
AUTHORS (6)
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to introduce and to evaluate the functional results of volar plating of distal radial fractures through a longitudinal minimally invasive approach.From January 2010 to January 2013, 157 patients with distal radial fractures were randomly allocated to group A (n = 83; 49 men, 34 women; mean age: 42 (18-67)) and B (n = 74; 46 men, 28 women; mean age: 41 (22-65)), including type A2, A3, B3, C1, and C2 fractures, based on AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification. Patients in group A were treated through a 1.5- to 2-cm longitudinal incision, and patients in group B were treated through the conventional flexor carpi radialis approach. All fractures were treated with a locking volar plate. The functional results were compared with range of motion, grip and pronation strengths for each fracture type.After a follow-up of 2 years, similar measurements were noted on range of motion and grip strength in both groups. Regarding pronation strength, group A was superior to group B (p < 0.05).Minimally invasive volar plating of distal radial fractures is a safe and reliable technique, resulting in better pronation function and appearance.Level I, Therapeutic study.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (30)
CITATIONS (11)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....