Typing of vancomycin-resistant enterococci with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in a nosocomial outbreak setting
0301 basic medicine
Enterococcus faecium
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/classification
Disease Outbreaks
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
03 medical and health sciences
Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods
MALDI-TOF MS
Humans
Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
Enterococcus faecium/classification
Cross Infection
Spectrometry
Reproducibility of Results
Mass
Bacterial Typing Techniques
Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization
VREfm
Cross Infection/microbiology
Vancomycin resistance
DOI:
10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.020
Publication Date:
2018-03-23T22:57:43Z
AUTHORS (15)
ABSTRACT
To investigate the usefulness of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) typing as a first-line epidemiological tool in a nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm).Fifty-five VREfm isolates, previously characterized by whole-genome sequencing (WGS), were included and analysed by MALDI-TOF MS. To take peak reproducibility into account, ethanol/formic acid extraction and other steps of the protocol were conducted in triplicate. Twenty-seven spectra were generated per isolate, and spectra were visually inspected to determine discriminatory peaks. The presence or absence of these was recorded in a peak scheme.Nine discriminatory peaks were identified. A characteristic pattern of these could distinguish between the three major WGS groups: WGS I, WGS II and WGS III. Only one of 38 isolates belonging to WGS I, WGS II or WGS III was misclassified. However, ten of the 17 isolates not belonging to WGS I, II or III displayed peak patterns indistinguishable from those of the outbreak strain.Using visual inspection of spectra, MALDI-TOF MS typing proved to be useful in differentiating three VREfm outbreak clones from each other. However, as non-outbreak isolates could not be reliably differentiated from outbreak clones, the practical value of this typing method for VREfm outbreak management was limited in our setting.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (13)
CITATIONS (13)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....