The effects of spatial stability and cue type on spatial learning: Implications for theories of parallel memory systems

• DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104802
• Publication Date: 2021-07-02T21:55:59Z
• Authors: Matthew G. Buckley; Joe M. Austen; Liam A.M. Myles; Shamus Smith; Niklas Ihssen; Adina R. Lew; Anthony McGregor
• Keywords: Landmark; Associative learning; Cognitive map; Sensory cue; Spatial Ability; Spatial Cognition

Some theories of spatial learning predict that associative rules apply under only limited circumstances. For example, based on a boundary has been claimed to be immune cue competition effects because information is the basis for formation cognitive map, whilst landmark does not involve mapping. This referred as type hypothesis. However, it also stability prerequisite meaning whichever was perceived stable would enter map and thus competition, while unstable cues will subject regardless type. In experiments 1 2 we manipulated when location two hidden goals. One goal constant with respect boundary, other cues. both types, presence distal orientation provided directional information. half participants were relative cues, whereas remainder landmarks second stage training, all remained so locations could learned According hypothesis, should block about stability. however, appear boundary. Regardless or results showed reciprocal blocking, contrary formulations incidental Experiment 3 established Experiments explained in terms difficulty certain different types. final experiment, following training which signalled locations, new before testing had never used define location. The this novel test interaction between indicated profound effect navigation counter predictions mapping boundaries.