Extreme ingroup and outgroup perspectives counter-intuitively impact intergroup polarisation at the level of neural oscillations
Outgroup
Ingroups and outgroups
In-group favoritism
DOI:
10.1016/j.cortex.2024.12.020
Publication Date:
2025-01-11T16:01:01Z
AUTHORS (2)
ABSTRACT
A powerful example of affective polarisation occurred between vaccine-supporters and -opposers when vaccinations were implemented to counter the recent global pandemic. In this social neuroscience study, we scanned 121 using magnetoencephalography evaluate three levels polarisation: explicit, implicit, neural - then test whether exposing people extreme ingroup perspectives (following paradoxical thinking principles) or outgroup can modulate those vaccinated unvaccinated individuals. We show that a proxy for intergroup polarisation, expressed as late prefrontal beta rhythm suppression, detect subtle changes in polarisation. More specifically, find (i.e., pro-vaccination) viewpoints leads decrease Conversely, exposure anti-vaccination) narratives increases which turn predicts positive affect towards vaccine opposers almost one year later. Altogether, results although it may seem intuitive expose counter-arguments perspectives) change their opinions, such an approach backlash increase instead. However, subtler methods intervention attitude have desired effects reduce
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (70)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....