Comparison of microbiological and molecular diagnosis for identification of respiratory secondary infections in COVID-19 patients and their antimicrobial resistance patterns

Male Adult Bacteria SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection COVID-19 Microbial Sensitivity Tests Bacterial Infections Middle Aged Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Anti-Bacterial Agents Molecular Diagnostic Techniques antimicrobial-resistance; culture-based diagnosis; molecular-based syndromic test; Real-Time PCR; SARS-CoV-2; secondary infection Drug Resistance, Bacterial Humans Female Respiratory Tract Infections Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Aged
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116479 Publication Date: 2024-08-03T22:34:21Z
ABSTRACT
We report the use of a new multiplex Real-Time PCR platform to simultaneously identify 24 pathogens and 3 antimicrobial-resistance genes directly from respiratory samples of COVID-19 patients. Results were compared to culture-based diagnosis. Secondary infections were detected in 60% of COVID-19 patients by molecular analysis and 73% by microbiological assays, with no significant differences in accuracy, indicating Gram-negative bacteria as the predominant species. Among fungal superinfections, Aspergillus spp. were detected by both methods in more than 7% of COVID-19 patients. Oxacillin-resistant S. aureus and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae were highlighted by both methods. Secondary microbial infections in SARS-CoV-2 patients are associated with poor outcomes and an increased risk of death. Since PCR-based tests significantly reduce the turnaround time to 4 hours and 30 minutes (compared to 48 hours for microbial culture), we strongly support the routine use of molecular techniques, in conjunction with microbiological analysis, to identify co/secondary infections.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (38)
CITATIONS (0)