Postoperative Radiotherapy for Maxillary Sinus Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes and Toxicities of Treatment

• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.032
• Publication Date: 2007-06-01T11:18:54Z
• Authors: Ian J. Bristol; Anesa Ahamad; Adam S. Garden; William H. Morrison; Ehab Y. Hanna; Vassiliki A. Papa...; David I. Rosenthal; K. Kian Ang
• Keywords: Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Male; Postoperative Care; Maxillary Sinus Neoplasms; Incidence; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; 3. Good health; Cohort Studies; Survival Rate; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Risk Factors; Humans; Female; Longitudinal Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Radiation Injuries; Aged; Retrospective Studies

To determine the effects of three changes in radiotherapy technique on the outcomes for patients irradiated postoperatively for maxillary sinus cancer.The data of 146 patients treated between 1969 and 2002 were reviewed. The patients were separated into two groups according to the date of treatment. Group 1 included 90 patients treated before 1991 and Group 2 included 56 patients treated after 1991, when the three changes were implemented. The outcomes were compared between the two groups.No differences were found in the 5-year overall survival, recurrence-free survival, local control, nodal control, or distant metastasis rates between the two groups (51% vs. 62%, 51% vs. 57%, 76% vs. 70%, 82% vs. 83%, and 28% vs. 17% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively). The three changes were to increase the portals to cover the base of the skull in patients with perineural invasion, reducing their risk of local recurrence; the addition of elective neck irradiation in patients with squamous or undifferentiated histologic features, improving the nodal control, distant metastasis, and recurrence-free survival rates (64% vs. 93%, 20% vs. 3%, and 45% vs. 67%, respectively; p < 0.05 for all comparisons); and improving the dose distributions within the target volume, reducing the late Grade 3-4 complication rates (34% in Group 1 vs. 8% in Group 2, p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis revealed advancing age, the need for enucleation, and positive margins as independent predictors of worse overall survival. The need for enucleation also predicted for worse local control.The three changes in radiotherapy technique improved the outcomes for select patients as predicted. Despite these changes, little demonstrable overall improvement occurred in local control or survival for these patients and additional work must be done.