Diagnostic value of lobar microbleeds in individuals without intracerebral hemorrhage

Male Aging Cerebrovascular Clinical Sciences Predictive value 610 Clinical sciences Neurodegenerative Rare Diseases Sensitivity Predictive Value of Tests Vascular Cognitive Impairment/Dementia Acquired Cognitive Impairment 80 and over Humans Cerebral amyloid angiopathy Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (ADRD) Microbleed Aged Cerebral Hemorrhage Aged, 80 and over Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Neurosciences Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) Brain Likelihood ratio Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Disorders Boston criteria 3. Good health Stroke Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Geriatrics Specificity Biomedical Imaging Biological psychology Dementia Female Intracerebral hemorrhage
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.009 Publication Date: 2015-06-14T13:40:19Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractIntroductionThe Boston criteria are the basis for a noninvasive diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in the setting of lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We assessed the accuracy of these criteria in individuals with lobar microbleeds (MBs) without ICH.MethodsWe identified individuals aged >55 years having brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological assessment of CAA in a single academic hospital and a community‐based population (Framingham Heart Study [FHS]). We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the Boston criteria for CAA in both cohorts, using lobar MBs as the only hemorrhagic lesion to fulfill the criteria.ResultsWe included 102 individuals: 55 from the hospital‐based cohort and 47 from FHS (mean age at MRI 74.7 ± 8.5 and 83.4 ± 10.9 years; CAA prevalence 60% and 46.8%; cases with any lobar MB 49% and 21.3%; and cases with ≥2 strictly lobar MBs 29.1% and 8.5%, respectively). PPV of “probable CAA” (≥2 strictly lobar MBs) was 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.4–97.8) and 25% (95% CI, 13.2–78) in hospital and general populations, respectively.DiscussionStrictly lobar MBs strongly predict CAA in non‐ICH individuals when found in a hospital context. However, their diagnostic accuracy in the general population appears limited.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (41)
CITATIONS (115)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....