Prognostic Implications of Residual Tricuspid Regurgitation Grading After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair
Male
Cardiac Catheterization
transcatheter intervention
Time Factors
610
survival
Severity of Illness Index
Risk Assessment
[SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system
Risk Factors
617
Humans
Registries
tricuspid regurgitation
Aged
[SDV.IB] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Aged, 80 and over
survival; transcatheter intervention; tricuspid regurgitation;
Middle Aged
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency
[SDV.MHEP.CSC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system
Treatment Outcome
[SDV.IB]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering
Female
Tricuspid Valve
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.023
Publication Date:
2024-05-16T12:48:50Z
AUTHORS (126)
ABSTRACT
The safety profile of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TTV) repair techniques is well established, but residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains a concern.The authors sought to assess the impact of residual TR severity post-TTV repair on survival.We evaluated the survival rate at 2 years of 613 patients with severe isolated functional TR who underwent TTV repair in TRIGISTRY according to the severity of residual TR at discharge using a 3-grade (mild, moderate, and severe) or 4-grade scheme (mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe, and severe).Residual TR was none/mild in 33%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 15%. The 2-year adjusted survival rates significantly differed between the 3 groups (85%, 70%, and 44%, respectively; restricted mean survival time [RMST]: P = 0.0001). When the 319 patients with moderate residual TR were subdivided into mild to moderate (n = 201, 33%) and moderate to severe (n = 118, 19%), the adjusted survival rate was also significantly different between groups (85%, 80%, 55%, and 44%, respectively; RMST: P = 0.001). Survival was significantly lower in patients with moderate to severe residual TR compared to patients with mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.006). No difference in survival rates was observed between patients with no/mild and mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.67) or between patients with moderate to severe and severe residual TR (P = 0.96).The moderate residual TR group was heterogeneous and encompassed patients with markedly different clinical outcomes. Refining TR grade classification with a more granular 4-grade scheme improved outcome prediction. Our results highlight the importance of achieving a mild to moderate or lower residual TR grade during TTV repair, which could define a successful intervention.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (22)
CITATIONS (24)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....