Benchmark of thirteen bioinformatic pipelines for metagenomic virus diagnostics using datasets from clinical samples
Benchmark
03 medical and health sciences
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/616
Virology
Viral metagenomics
Humans
ddc:616
0303 health sciences
Science & Technology
ENCEPHALITIS
Bioinformatic pipelines
Computational Biology
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
2725 Infectious Diseases
3. Good health
ALIGNMENT
Benchmarking
Infectious Diseases
Viruses
2406 Virology
570 Life sciences; biology
Metagenomics
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
10244 Institute of Virology
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104908
Publication Date:
2021-07-08T17:52:41Z
AUTHORS (30)
ABSTRACT
Metagenomic sequencing is increasingly being used in clinical settings for difficult to diagnose cases. The performance of viral metagenomic protocols relies a large extent on the bioinformatic analysis. In this study, European Society Clinical Virology (ESCV) Network NGS (ENNGS) initiated benchmark pipelines currently virological laboratories.Metagenomic datasets from 13 samples patients with encephalitis or respiratory infections characterized by PCR were selected. analyzed different diagnostic laboratories participating ENNGS members. and classification tools were: Centrifuge, DAMIAN, DIAMOND, DNASTAR, FEVIR, Genome Detective, Jovian, MetaMIC, MetaMix, One Codex, RIEMS, VirMet, Taxonomer. Performance, characteristics, use, user-friendliness these analyzed.Overall, pathogens high loads detected all evaluated pipelines. contrast, lower abundance mixed only 3/13 pipelines, namely MetaMix. Overall sensitivity ranged 80% (10/13) 100% (13/13 datasets). positive predictive value 71-100%. majority classified sequences based nucleotide similarity (8/13), minority amino acid similarity, 6 assembled de novo. No clear differences that correlated approaches. Read counts target viruses varied between over range 2-3 log, indicating limit detection.A wide variety laboratories. Detection low abundant remains challenge, implicating need standardization validation analysis use. Future studies should address selective effects due choice reference databases.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (55)
CITATIONS (50)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....