Voluntary voting: Costs and benefits

Bullet voting Anti-plurality voting Ranked voting system Single-member district Voting trust
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2012.09.006 Publication Date: 2012-10-01T20:01:45Z
ABSTRACT
We compare voluntary and compulsory voting in a Condorcet-type model in which voters have identical preferences but dierential information. With voluntary voting, all equilibria involve sincere voting and positive participation. Thus, in contrast to situations with compulsory voting, there is no con‡ict be- tween strategic and sincere behavior. When voting is costless, voluntary voting is welfare superior to compulsory voting. Even when voting is costly, participa- tion rates are such that, in the limit, the correct candidate is elected— that is, information fully aggregates.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (28)
CITATIONS (57)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....