Highly efficient free-breathing 3D whole-heart imaging in 3-min: single center study in adults with congenital heart disease

• DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100008
• Publication Date: 2024-03-15T05:02:13Z
• Authors: Anastasia Fotaki; Kuberan Pushparajah; Christopher Rush; Camila Munoz; Carlos Velasco; Radhouene Neji; Karl P. Kunze; René M. Botnar; Claudia Prieto
• Keywords: Low-rank; RC666-701; 3D whole-heart; INAV; 610; Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system; Medicina y salud; Congenital heart disease; Original Research

Three dimensional, whole-heart (3DWH) MRI is an established non-invasive imaging modality in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) for the diagnosis of cardiovascular morphology and for clinical decision making. Current techniques utilise diaphragmatic navigation (dNAV) for respiratory motion correction and gating and are frequently limited by long acquisition times. This study proposes and evaluates the diagnostic performance of a respiratory gating-free framework, which considers respiratory image-based navigation (iNAV), and highly accelerated variable density Cartesian sampling in concert with non-rigid motion correction and low-rank patch-based denoising (iNAV-3DWH-PROST). The method is compared to the clinical dNAV-3DWH sequence in adult patients with CHD.In this prospective single center study, adult patients with CHD who underwent the clinical dNAV-3DWH MRI were also scanned with the iNAV-3DWH-PROST. Diagnostic confidence (4-point Likert scale) and diagnostic accuracy for common cardiovascular lesions was assessed by three readers. Scan times and diagnostic confidence were compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Co-axial vascular dimensions at three anatomic landmarks were measured, and agreement between the research and the corresponding clinical sequence was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis.The study included 60 participants (mean age ± [SD]: 33 ± 14 years; 36 men). The mean acquisition time of iNAV-3DWH-PROST was significantly lower compared with the conventional clinical sequence (3.1 ± 0.9 min vs 13.9 ± 3.9 min, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic confidence was higher for the iNAV-3DWH-PROST sequence compared with the clinical sequence (3.9 ± 0.2 vs 3.4 ± 0.8, p < 0.001), however there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. Narrow limits of agreement and mean bias less than 0.08 cm were found between the research and the clinical vascular measurements.The iNAV-3DWH-PROST framework provides efficient, high quality and robust 3D whole-heart imaging in significantly shorter scan time compared to the standard clinical sequence.