Medical students' perception and academic performance after team-based and seminar-based learning in human anatomy

• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.08.005
• Publication Date: 2022-09-05T06:09:36Z
• Authors: Adel M. Aboregela; Hany M.A. Sonpol; Ashraf S. Metwally; Ayman M. El-Ashkar; Abdullah A. Hashish; Osama A. Mohammed; Tarek A. Elnahriry; Ahmed Senbel; Mushabab Alghamdi
• Keywords: TBL; Medicine (General); R5-920; 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering; Original Article; Seminar; 02 engineering and technology; University of Bisha; Anatomy education

Student-centered educational strategies like problem-based learning (PBL), case-based learning (CBL), team-based learning (TBL), and seminars enhance group and self-learning. This study was carried out to evaluate students' achievements in anatomy topics delivered through TBL sessions and seminars and to survey student preferences regarding these two modalities in anatomy learning.TBL was conducted through individual readiness assurance tests (IRATs), group readiness assurance tests (GRATs), mini-lectures, and application exercises. Seminars included pretests, peer lecturing, and posttests. The performance of 117 students in three TBL sessions and three seminars was compared after standardizing the questions. The students were second-year (42), third-year (40), and fourth-year (35) students at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, KSA, during the 2019/2020 academic year.A gradual increase in the means of TBL grades was noticed among second-, third-, and four-year students (means ± SD: 68.6 ± 9.56, 82.8 ± 12.25, and 92.7 ± 4.70, respectively), but their seminar grades were nearly stationary (means ± SD: 80.0 ± 9.66, 85.11 ± 10.16, and 85.9 ± 8.80, respectively). Cohen's d-test to check the strength of the relationship between the two activities showed 1.03, 0.16, and 0.74 in the same order. We statistically analyzed perception and preference questionnaire results received from 39, 35, and 28 second-, third-, and four-year students, respectively. The majority of the students selected TBL as their preferred learning modality. However, their acceptance of the seminars was very poor.It can be concluded that TBL is more beneficial to the students, even in practical sciences like anatomy, most likely because group peer teaching enhances the sense of collegial competition, as opposed to the self-learning nature of seminars, which might suppress the sense of competition.