Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial

Clinical endpoint Resection margin Distal pancreatectomy
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100673 Publication Date: 2023-07-06T21:41:26Z
AUTHORS (93)
ABSTRACT
The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking.In this international non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults from 35 centres 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) open (ODP). Both and pathologists blinded approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1 mm free margin) who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses primary by modified intention-to-treat, excluding missing data on endpoint. pre-defined margin -7% compared lower limit two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) absolute difference This trial is registered ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265).Between May 8, 2018 7, 2021, 258 (131 patients) ODP (127 patients). Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 114 group 110 group. An R0 occurred 83 (73%) 76 (69%) (difference 3.7%, CI -6.2 13.6%; pnon-inferiority = 0.039). Median lymph node yield comparable (22.0 [16.0-30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0-32.0] nodes, p 0.86), rate intraperitoneal recurrence (41% 38%, 0.45). follow-up 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0-30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes comparable, including median time functional recovery (5 [95% 4.5-5.5] 5 4.7-5.3] days; 0.22) overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% 0.67-1.46, 0.94). Serious adverse events reported 23 (18%) 131 28 (22%) 127 group.This provides evidence rates cancer. present findings support applicability left-sided cancer.Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson & Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (37)
CITATIONS (52)