Evaluation of bone loss in antibacterial coated dental implants: An experimental study in dogs
Gossos
TESPSA
Surface Properties
Silver electrodeposition
Antibacterial coating
Gingiva
610
Recobriment antibacterià
616.3
:Enginyeria dels materials [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC]
Bacteris
Antibacterial coating, Dental implants, In vivo, Peri-implantitis, Silver electrodeposition, TESPSA
03 medical and health sciences
Dogs
0302 clinical medicine
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
dental implants
617
silver electrodeposition
Periimplantitis
Animals
Bone Resorption
Perros
Gossos -- Malalties
Dental Implants
Ions
Implantes dentales
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria dels materials
Implants dentals
Bacteria
Dental implants
Electrodeposició de plata
Pròtesis dentals
Recubrimiento antibacterias
Electrodeposición de plata
Anti-Bacterial Agents
3. Good health
in vivo
Antibacterial agents
Materials biomèdics
Female
Bacterias
Biomedical materials
peri-implantitis
DOI:
10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.020
Publication Date:
2016-07-10T04:46:24Z
AUTHORS (9)
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effect of antibacterial modified dental implants in the first stages of peri-implantitis. Thirty dental implants were inserted in the mandibular premolar sites of 5 beagle dogs. Sites were randomly assigned to Ti (untreated implants, 10units), Ti_Ag (silver electrodeposition treatment, 10units), and Ti_TSP (silanization treatment, 10units). Coated implants were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, interferometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Two months after implant insertion, experimental peri-implantitis was initiated by ligature placement. Ligatures were removed 2months later, and plaque formation was allowed for 2 additional months. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed during the study. Implant-tissue samples were prepared for micro computed tomography, backscattered scanning electron microscopy, histomorphometric and histological analyses and ion release measurements. X-ray, SEM and histology images showed that vertical bone resorption in treated implants was lower than in the control group (P<0.05). This effect is likely due to the capacity of the treatments to reduce bacteria colonization on the implant surface. Histological analysis suggested an increase of peri-implant bone formation on silanized implants. However, the short post-ligature period was not enough to detect differences in clinical parameters among implant groups. Within the limits of this study, antibacterial surface treatments have a positive effect against bone resorption induced by peri-implantitis.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (44)
CITATIONS (54)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....