Ongoing activity in trigeminal wide-dynamic range neurons is driven from the periphery

• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.032
• Publication Date: 2007-09-20T11:21:16Z
• Authors: M. Roch; K. Messlinger; V. Kulchitsky; O. Tichonovich; O. Azev; S. Koulchitsky
• Keywords: Microinjections; Lidocaine; Nociceptors; Rats; Electrophysiology; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Face; Animals; Neurons, Afferent; Trigeminal Nerve; Anesthetics, Local; Rats, Wistar; Trigeminal Nucleus, Spinal

Ongoing activity of spinal trigeminal neurons is observed under various conditions and suggested to be responsible for ongoing headache. It can be spontaneous, i.e. arising intrinsically from the neuron, or the product of descending influences from other central neurons, or maintained by ongoing afferent input. The aim of the present study was to examine if ongoing activity of neurons in different subnuclei of the spinal trigeminal nucleus is driven from peripheral afferent input. Experiments were performed in Wistar rats anesthetized with isoflurane or Nembutal/urethane. Ongoing activity of single wide-dynamic range (WDR) neurons was recorded with carbon fiber glass microelectrodes in two subnuclei of the spinal trigeminal nucleus: oral (Sp5O) and caudal (Sp5C). Peripheral receptive fields were evaluated using von Frey filaments. Sp5O neurons received peripheral input from facial areas innervated by the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve. Units in Sp5C had receptive fields in the surgically exposed dura mater and in facial areas innervated by the ophthalmic and maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve. Saline or the local anesthetic lidocaine was locally applied onto the exposed dura mater or microinjected into V3 (for Sp5O units) or V1/V2 (for Sp5C units) divisions of the trigeminal ganglion via the infraorbital channel. Local application of lidocaine onto the exposed dura caused mechanical insensitivity of dural receptive fields but not significant decrease in ongoing activity. Microinjection of lidocaine but not saline into the trigeminal ganglion was followed by a substantial decrease in both the receptive field size and the activity of the recorded WDR units. Mechanical insensitivity of receptive fields after trigeminal ganglion blockade was accompanied by the disappearance of ongoing activity. We conclude that the ongoing activity of WDR neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, which may be indicative for processes of sensitization, is driven remotely by ongoing afferent input.