The BCS–Bose crossover theory

• DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2006.12.004
• Publication Date: 2006-12-21T12:25:19Z
• Authors: S.K. Adhikari; M. de Llano; F.J. Sevilla; M.A. Solís; J.J. Valencia
• Keywords: BCS theory; Cooper pair

thirteen pages including two figures. Physica C (in press, 2007)<br/>We contrast {\it four} distinct versions of the BCS-Bose statistical crossover theory according to the form assumed for the electron-number equation that accompanies the BCS gap equation. The four versions correspond to explicitly accounting for two-hole-(2h) as well as two-electron-(2e) Cooper pairs (CPs), or both in equal proportions, or only either kind. This follows from a recent generalization of the Bose-Einstein condensation (GBEC) statistical theory that includes not boson-boson interactions but rather 2e- and also (without loss of generality) 2h-CPs interacting with unpaired electrons and holes in a single-band model that is easily converted into a two-band model. The GBEC theory is essentially an extension of the Friedberg-T.D. Lee 1989 BEC theory of superconductors that excludes 2h-CPs. It can thus recover, when the numbers of 2h- and 2e-CPs in both BE-condensed and noncondensed states are separately equal, the BCS gap equation for all temperatures and couplings as well as the zero-temperature BCS (rigorous-upper-bound) condensation energy for all couplings. But ignoring either 2h- {\it or} 2e-CPs it can do neither. In particular, only {\it half} the BCS condensation energy is obtained in the two crossover versions ignoring either kind of CPs. We show how critical temperatures $T_{c}$ from the original BCS-Bose crossover theory in 2D require unphysically large couplings for the Cooper/BCS model interaction to differ significantly from the $T_{c}$s of ordinary BCS theory (where the number equation is substituted by the assumption that the chemical potential equals the Fermi energy).<br/>