4 Valuable collaboration between a molecular CFTR database and a national CF registry: the French experience

• DOI: 10.1016/s1569-1993(16)30244-2
• Publication Date: 2016-06-03T07:33:23Z
• Authors: C. Bareil; L. Lemonnier; C. Dehillotte; V. Colomb-Jung; C. Thèze; M.-P. Audrézet; C. Férec; T. Bienvenu; E. Girodon; P. Fanen; C. Mekki; E. Bieth; V. Gaston; P. Fergelot; M.-P. Reboul; A. Kitzis; G. Lalau; A. Pagin; M.-C. Malinge; C. Raynal; M. Claustres
• Keywords: 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; 3. Good health

4 Valuable collaboration between a molecular CFTR database and a national CF registry: the French experience C. Bareil, L. Lemonnier, C. Dehillotte, V. Colomb-Jung, C. Theze, M.-P. Audrezet, C. Ferec, T. Bienvenu, E. Girodon, P. Fanen, C. Mekki, E. Bieth, V. Gaston, P. Fergelot, M.-P. Reboul, A. Kitzis, G. Lalau, A. Pagin, M.-C. Malinge, C. Raynal, M. Claustres. CHRU de Montpellier, Laboratoire de Genetique Moleculaire, Montpellier, France; Association Vaincre La Mucoviscidose, Paris, France; CHRU Brest, Laboratoire de Genetique Moleculaire, Brest, France; Hopital Cochin, APHP, Service de Genetique et Biologie Moleculaires, Paris, France; GH Henri Mondor, Departement de Genetique, Creteil, France; CHRU de Toulouse, Service de Genetique Medicale, Toulouse, France; Hopital Pellegrin – CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire de Genetique Moleculaire, Bordeaux, France; CHU de Poitiers, Service de Genetique, Poitiers, France; CHRU de Lille, Service de Toxicologie et Genopathies, Lille, France; CHU Angers, UF de Genetique Moleculaire – Departement de Biochimie Genetique, Angers, France In 2013 the French CF Registry and CFTR-France database managers started collaborating to address the limitations of each base, due to the lack of genetics and clinical data cross comparison. The aim was to check and update clinical data in CFTR-France and genetic data in the Registry. Records from the two databases were compared using name, date of birth, gender, sex and mutations. Matched and unmatched records were identified. Discrepancies were checked and confirmed by the laboratories and then sent to the CF centres. Comparison of 8807 patients in the Registry and 4617 in CFTR-France identified 1924 full match and 321 partially matched records. Molecular laboratories confirmations added 216 full matches. The remaining 105 patients still need confirmation by laboratories and CF centres. Among the 321 patients, personal data and/or genotype discrepancies were identified for respectively 70 and 129 patients. This database crossing allowed 110 genotypes to be corrected/completed in the Registry, which is of major interest. Indeed, if those incorrect data are also present in the CF centre medical files, they can impact familial genetic counselling and impair patients’ access to optimal mutation targeted therapies. Clinical data provided by the Registry are currently being analysed to complete the CFTR-France phenotypic status of patients. In-depth analysis of these data allows patients to be re-classified in different phenotypic groups (CF, CBAVD, isolated bronchiectasis or pancreatitis) and genotype/phenotype relationships to be refined, in order to better manage rare variants interpretation, medical care strategy and genetic counselling to families.