Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices

• DOI: 10.1017/cts.2025.51
• Publication Date: 2025-03-19T08:46:22Z
• Authors: Shannon Sanchez-Y...; Belkis Jacquez; Prajakta Adsul; Elizabeth Dickson; Tabia Henry Akintobi; LaShawn Hoffman; Lisa G. Rosas; Starla Gay; Jason A. Mendoza; Diane Mapes; John Oetzel; Donald Nease; Nina Wallerstein
• Keywords: Equity

Abstract

Introduction: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and patient/ community engaged research (P/CEnR) are shown to be effective approaches that improve health inequities, particularly among disadvantaged populations. While the science of CBPR demonstrates promising partnering practices that lead to effective interventions, there are institutional and structural barriers to creating and sustaining patient/community research within academic health centers (AHCs). As the field matures, there is a growing need to enhance patient/community leadership so that communities can set their own research agendas and priorities.

Methods: Engage for Equity PLUS sought to address these challenges by implementing an engagement intervention aimed at transforming AHCs through supporting champion teams of academic, community, and patient partners to strengthen research infrastructures for P/CEnR. This paper uses a qualitative, case study analysis to describe how E2PLUS enabled champion teams at Stanford School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, and Morehouse School of Medicine to pursue institutional change strategies through coaching, workshops, contextual data analysis, and a community of practice.

Results: This paper describes key themes of how E2Plus helped identify targets of change by a) using institutional data collection as core to generating critical consciousness of contextual conditions; b) implementing feasible E2PLUS strategies to leverage conditions for catalyzing a champion team for advocacy and achievable actions; c) identifying the critical role of patients/community members in stimulating change; and d) the role of continual collective reflection.

Conclusion: We discuss the overall implications for E2 PLUS for other AHCs working toward sustainable community/patient engaged research policies and practices.