To Gender or not To Gender? Exploring Gender Variations through Time and Space
gender archaeology
European Bronze Age
5. Gender equality
binary gender
930
0601 history and archaeology
European Neolithic
06 humanities and the arts
contextual gender
grand narratives
DOI:
10.1017/eaa.2022.51
Publication Date:
2023-01-09T23:40:47Z
AUTHORS (15)
ABSTRACT
This article is based on an EAA session in Kiel in 2021, in which thirteen contributors provide their response to Robb and Harris's (2018) overview of studies of gender in the European Neolithic and Bronze Age, with a reply by Robb and Harris. The central premise of their 2018 article was the opposition of ‘contextual Neolithic gender’ to ‘cross-contextual Bronze Age gender’, which created uneasiness among the four co-organizers of the Kiel meeting. Reading Robb and Harris's original article leaves the impression that there is an essentialist ‘Neolithic’ and ‘Bronze Age’ gender, the former being under-theorized, unclear, and unstable, the latter binary, unchangeable, and ideological. While Robb and Harris have clearly advanced the discussion on gender, the perspectives and case studies presented here, while critical of their views, take the debate further, painting a more complex and diverse picture that strives to avoid essentialism.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (82)
CITATIONS (9)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....