Frailty trajectories in three longitudinal studies of aging: Is the level or the rate of change more predictive of mortality?

• DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab106
• Publication Date: 2021-05-11T11:42:57Z
• Authors: Ge Bai; Agnieszka Szwajda; Yunzhang Wang; Xia Li; Hannah Bower; Ida K Karlsson; Boo Johansson; Anna K Dahl Aslan; Nancy L Pedersen; Sara Hägg; Juulia Jylhävä
• Keywords: Aging; Frailty; Frail Elderly; Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology; Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa och socialmedicin; frailty; Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine; mortality; age at death; 3. Good health; older people; Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; trajectories; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Geriatric Assessment; Research Paper; Aged

Abstract

Background frailty shows an upward trajectory with age, and higher levels increase the risk of mortality. However, it is less known whether the shape of frailty trajectories differs by age at death or whether the rate of change in frailty is associated with mortality.

Objectives to assess population frailty trajectories by age at death and to analyse whether the current level of the frailty index (FI) i.e. the most recent measurement or the person-specific rate of change is more predictive of mortality.

Methods 3,689 individuals from three population-based cohorts with up to 15 repeated measurements of the Rockwood frailty index were analysed. The FI trajectories were assessed by stratifying the sample into four age-at-death groups: <70, 70–80, 80–90 and >90 years. Generalised survival models were used in the survival analysis.

Results the FI trajectories by age at death showed that those who died at <70 years had a steadily increasing trajectory throughout the 40 years before death, whereas those who died at the oldest ages only accrued deficits from age ~75 onwards. Higher level of FI was independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.47–1.91), whereas the rate of change was no longer significant after accounting for the current FI level. The effect of the FI level did not weaken with time elapsed since the last measurement.

Conclusions Frailty trajectories differ as a function of age-at-death category. The current level of FI is a stronger marker for risk stratification than the rate of change.