Ventilation practices in burn patients—an international prospective observational cohort study

Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects Anestesi och intensivvård [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] Biomedical Engineering Medical biotechnology 610 RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME Clinical sciences Dermatology Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine LAMiNAR investigators Mechanical ventilation Clinical Research Mechanical ventilation; Inhalation trauma; Lung-protective; Critical care 617 Medicine and Health Sciences Immunology and Allergy Lung OUTCOMES Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Anesthesiology and Intensive Care MORTALITY CONSERVATIVE OXYGEN-THERAPY Paediatrics ASSOCIATION INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS PROTECTIVE VENTILATION PREVENTION MECHANICAL VENTILATION Critical care INHALATION INJURY Lung-protective Emergency Medicine Respiratory Surgery Biomedical engineering Inhalation trauma Research Article
DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab034 Publication Date: 2021-09-08T11:38:21Z
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background It is unknown whether lung-protective ventilation is applied in burn patients and whether they benefit from it. This study aimed to determine ventilation practices in burn intensive care units (ICUs) and investigate the association between lung-protective ventilation and the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 (VFD-28). Methods This is an international prospective observational cohort study including adult burn patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Low tidal volume (VT) was defined as VT ≤ 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW). Levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and maximum airway pressures were collected. The association between VT and VFD-28 was analyzed using a competing risk model. Ventilation settings were presented for all patients, focusing on the first day of ventilation. We also compared ventilation settings between patients with and without inhalation trauma. Results A total of 160 patients from 28 ICUs in 16 countries were included. Low VT was used in 74% of patients, median VT size was 7.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.2–8.3] mL/kg PBW and did not differ between patients with and without inhalation trauma (p = 0.58). Median VFD-28 was 17 (IQR 0–26), without a difference between ventilation with low or high VT (p = 0.98). All patients were ventilated with PEEP levels ≥5 cmH2O; 80% of patients had maximum airway pressures <30 cmH2O. Conclusion In this international cohort study we found that lung-protective ventilation is used in the majority of burn patients, irrespective of the presence of inhalation trauma. Use of low VT was not associated with a reduction in VFD-28. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02312869. Date of registration: 9 December 2014.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (50)
CITATIONS (2)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....