Early ST elevation myocardial infarction in non-capable percutaneous coronary intervention centres:in situfibrinolysis vs. percutaneous coronary intervention transfer

Codi IAM Male Patient Transfer Fibrinolysis Middle Aged STEMI network Time-to-Treatment 3. Good health STEMI Hospitalization 03 medical and health sciences Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 0302 clinical medicine Spain Humans ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Female Thrombolytic Therapy Prospective Studies Primary angioplasty Retrospective Studies
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv619 Publication Date: 2016-01-11T21:05:37Z
ABSTRACT
The preferred reperfusion strategy for early ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, defined as time from symptoms onset ≤120 min) in non-capable percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres remains controversial. We sought to compare mortality of situ fibrinolysis vs. PCI transfer a real-life consecutive cohort STEMI.Prospective multicentre STEMI registry (Catalonia 'Codi IAM' network) all-comers centre with symptom first medical contact (FMC) <120 min. Two groups were identified: and PCI-capable centre. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. included 2470 patients, whom 2227 (90.2%) 243 (9.8%) comprised the groups, respectively. In group, diagnostic system delays shorter (24 31 min, P < 0.001; 45 119 0.001, respectively). Thirty-day 7.7 5.1% respectively (P = 0.09). However, patients group whose FMC-device achieved within 140 min associated significantly lower (2.0% <99 4.6% 99-140 min; 0.01 0.03, fibrinolysis). multivariable logistic regression analysis, an independent predictive factor (odds ratio: 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-3.50; 0.04), together age Killip-Kimball class (both 0.001).In assisted centres, had worse prognosis than patient transfer. Transfer seems recommended delay <140
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (25)
CITATIONS (37)