Clinicopathologic Study of 62 Acinar Cell Carcinomas of the Pancreas
Male
Acinar Cell
Predictive Value of Test
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
0302 clinical medicine
Japan
morphology
80 and over
acinar cell carcinoma
Multivariate Analysi
Aged, 80 and over
Tumor
Pancreatic Neoplasm
Middle Aged
Necrosi
Immunohistochemistry
Tumor Burden
3. Good health
Europe
pancrea
Lymphatic Metastasis
Female
Anatomy
Human
United State
Adult
Prognosi
2734
Risk Assessment
Immunophenotyping
Necrosis
03 medical and health sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor
Humans
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Aged
Cell Proliferation
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasm Invasivene
Carcinoma, Acinar Cell
Risk Factor
Carcinoma
Lymphatic Metastasi
acinar cell carcinoma; Pancreas; Prognostic markers
acinar cell carcinoma; morphology; pancreas; prognostic markers
Multivariate Analysis
Proportional Hazards Model
Surgery
prognostic marker
Biomarkers
DOI:
10.1097/pas.0b013e318263209d
Publication Date:
2012-10-01T02:54:47Z
AUTHORS (12)
ABSTRACT
Acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) of the pancreas is a very rare tumor that has various morphologic features, which may give rise to diagnostic difficulties. Because of its rarity, many clinicopathologic characteristics remain to be further elucidated, and prognostic factors are yet to be well established. With the aim of better characterizing this carcinoma and searching for prognostic indicators, we collected 62 ACCs and investigated the following parameters: site, size, local infiltration, node and distant metastases, architectural pattern, nuclear atypia, presence of necrosis, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, proliferation, BCL10, trypsin, carboxyl ester lipase, amylase, lipase, PDX1, cytokeratin 19 (CK19), CK7, p53, and β-catenin expression. Twelve cases showing >30% of endocrine cells were reclassified as mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas, whereas 1 tumor was reclassified as a mixed ductal-acinar carcinoma and was excluded from the statistical prognostic evaluations. BCL10 and trypsin were the most reliable immunohistochemical markers, whereas amylase and lipase were not. Surgery was statistically correlated with a better prognosis (P=0.0008). Among resected tumors there was no difference in survival between ACCs and mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas, and factors that significantly correlated with poor prognosis were size >6.5 cm (P=0.004), lymph node (P=0.0039) and distant (P=0.008) metastases, and UICC stage (P=0.009). Stage was the only independent prognostic factor at multivariable analysis, and the best prognostic discrimination was observed on grouping together stages I and II and grouping together stages III and IV, suggesting a simplification of the UICC staging for such cancers. In addition, vascular and perineural invasion and CK19 and p53 expression showed a trend for poor prognosis, not reaching statistical significance.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (39)
CITATIONS (161)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....