The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial

• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13435
• Publication Date: 2019-05-06T23:35:54Z
• Authors: Dechawat Kaewsiri; Soontra Panmekiate; Keskanya Subbalekha; Nikos Mattheos; Atiphan Pimkhaokham
• Keywords: Absolute deviation

Abstract Objectives The aim of this RCT was to compare the accuracy implant placement between static and dynamic computer‐assisted surgery (CAIS) systems in single tooth space. Materials methods A total 60 patients need a were randomly assigned two CAIS groups (Static n = 30, Dynamic 30) implants placed by one surgeon. Preoperative CBCT transferred planning software plan optimal position. Implants using either stereolithographic guide template CAIS) or navigation system (Dynamic CAIS). Postoperative imported software, deviation analysis with planned position performed. Primary outcomes measurements at platform, apex, angle placement. Secondary outcome distribution into each 3D direction. Results mean platform apex group 0.97 ± 0.44 mm 1.28 0.46 mm, while that 1.05 1.29 0.50 respectively. angular 2.84 1.71 degrees 3.06 1.37 degrees. None above differences reached statistical significance. toward mesial direction significantly higher than ( p 0.032). Conclusions Implant space appear be same CAIS. (Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20180826001).