Engagement partner identification format and audit quality

Quality audit Identification Association (psychology)
DOI: 10.1111/ijau.12315 Publication Date: 2023-06-08T07:05:55Z
ABSTRACT
Exploiting the staggered adoption of three key regulations that implemented distinct engagement partner identification (EPI) formats for separate groups Canadian firms over a 10‐year period, we investigate association between eight audit quality proxies and EPI formats: two indirect (auditor permit number in report, Form AP) one direct (partner name report). This unique setting not only enables us to examine short‐term different but also long‐term format number). In main analysis, out 32 results interest, are significant indicate positive association. Hence, our show no widespread effect on quality, suggesting inconsistent reported prior studies may be driven by explored or short window investigated.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (88)
CITATIONS (1)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....