Risk factors for readmission following inpatient management of COVID‐19 in a low‐prevalence setting
Table (database)
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
Content (measure theory)
Table of contents
DOI:
10.1111/imj.15218
Publication Date:
2021-05-28T02:18:11Z
AUTHORS (10)
ABSTRACT
There are minimal data on post-COVID-19 readmissions in relatively low-prevalence countries such as Australia. Data prior to COVID-19 demonstrate that hospitalised patients have up a 20% chance of 30-day unplanned readmission, representing significant human, financial and resource burden.1 We performed single-centre, observational cohort study inpatients admitted Austin Health from March October 2020, investigating demographic, clinical, laboratory treatment parameters associated with readmission hospital within 6 months following initial inpatient management COVID-19. Patients single index admission were compared those readmitted, then grouped according reason for (i.e. respiratory or COVID-19-specific symptoms, complications COVID-19, unrelated presentation). Chi-squared rank sum tests univariate analysis using Stata MP16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). the summarised Table 1. Of 169 between 2020 who survived discharge, 24 (14.2%) readmitted (median, 36 days; interquartile range, 15–67 days). Ten (5.9%) re-presented five (3.0%) complications, nine (5.3%) problems (Supporting Information S1). In whole analysis, increased length stay during was significantly (5 days vs 7 days, P = 0.04). A non-significant increase noted pre-existing chronic disease, requiring supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU). sub-group only symptoms (n 15), ICU (P 0.04), oxygen 0.03) high-flow nasal (HFNO) 0.01) readmission. 30 12), disease (21.7% 41.7%, 0.12), association found HFNO 0.004). To our knowledge, this is first trends hospitalisation country. Our compare large US registry reported 60-day re-presentation rate 9%, COVID-19-related 45%, included comorbidity risk re-presentation.3 positive contrast other studies where premature discharge thought contribute 'bounce-back' admissions.3, 4 Although limited by small numbers single-centre follow up, we an indicating more severe illness course (ICU, HFNO, stay) although no National Institutes (NIH)-calculated severity at presentation2 International experience early after shows mixed results;4, 5 however, likelihood has been poor prognosis studies.6 As stay, admission, requirement group should be focus targeted post-acute care. S1 Reason re-admission. Please note: The publisher not responsible content functionality any supporting information supplied authors. Any queries (other than missing content) directed corresponding author article.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (6)
CITATIONS (7)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....