Tattoos and skin barrier function: Measurements of TEWL, stratum corneum conductance and capacitance, pH, and filaggrin

filaggrin tattoo Adult Male 0301 basic medicine capacitance Filaggrin Proteins Electric Capacitance Permeability Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Intermediate Filament Proteins Skin Physiological Phenomena Humans Aged Tattooing pH Electric Conductivity transepidermal water loss Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Middle Aged Water Loss, Insensible 3. Good health skin barrier function Female Epidermis conductance Follow-Up Studies
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12664 Publication Date: 2019-01-02T08:49:34Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractBackgroundInitially after tattooing, the skin barrier function is broken. However, the long‐term impact of clinically healed tattoos on this has never been studied. The aim was to investigate the long‐term effect on the skin barrier function in normal tattoos and examples of tattoos with chronic inflammatory complication.MethodsParticipants were recruited from the “Tattoo clinic” of the Dermatological Department on Bispebjerg Hospital in Denmark, where patients with complicated tattoo reactions are treated. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), conductance, capacitance, and pH were measured in tattooed skin with regional control measurements in normal non‐tattooed skin. Natural moisturizing factor (NMF) was measured in collected tape strips.ResultsTwenty six individuals with 28 tattoos were included, that is, 23 normal tattoos without any pathologic reaction and 5 tattoos with chronic inflammatory complications. No significant differences were found in tattooed versus non‐tattooed skin with respect to TEWL (median values 6.6 vs 7.2 g/m2/h), conductance (76 vs 78 a.u.), pH (5.94 vs 5.79), and NMF (0.58 vs 0.59 mmol/g protein). Capacitance (64 vs 57 a.u.) was higher in tattooed skin compared to non‐tattooed skin (P = 0.006). Similar results were found in tattoos with inflammatory reactions.ConclusionOverall, skin tattoos do not affect the long‐term skin barrier function markedly. The skin capacitance was, however, affected in tattooed skin areas compared to non‐tattooed skin areas.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (49)
CITATIONS (8)